by RagnVald » Fri May 18, 2012 9:38 pm
JP40 - It is the Family Law which states that the primary consideration in the best interests fo the child, is that the child has a `meaningful relationship' with both parents. Serious questions can be raised as to how the law can impose a `meaningful relationship' on any two people, especially if one of the parties does not wish to have such a relationship (usually the child).
Also this principle was founded on a gross distortion of the research. The research studies show that `Shared Parenting' can work in a small number of cases where certain conditions apply. e.g. where both parents have taken an active interest in the children, and have worked cooperatively to help the child develop. Also that the parents maintain a good relationship after the separation and work together cooperatively and conciliatory, and with flexibility and place their children's needs first. When parents are in conflict or where one of the parents feels vindictive and vengeful towards the other, then such shared parenting doesn't work and the children are used as pawns to hurt and exert power over the other parent. The children suffer enormous harm in such situations but are forced to comply under the `Best interests principle'. More important research has shown that when the children and young people who are affected are directly involved in the decision-making processes and feel they have had some influence on the decisions regarding their future care and welfare, then the outcomes are greatly improved for those children. Courts however pay little, if any. regard for the views and wishes of children and young people in such matters, despite that research.